Connect with us

Headlines

Rice: The New Edible Gold

Published

on

By Eric Elezuo

About two months ago, the President Muhammadu Buhari led Federal Government ordered the closure of the nation’s borders, the Seme border inclusive. His reasons were bordered on the desire to stop the proliferation of small arms and illegal smuggling of food items, especially rice and frozen foods. Ever since then, rice, which hitherto has been Nigeria’s staple food, has become a luxurious commodity as its rice has hit the roof. Since the shutdown, the cost of a bag of imported rice has reportedly jumped by over 40% – from N14,000/15,000 to N21,000/23,000.

In the midst of the complains, the Nigerian government has maintained that its borders would remain closed until neighbouring countries begin to respect Nigeria’s policy on food importation. This notice has elicited negative reactions from neighbouring countries. Niger Republic for one has banned both importation and exportation of good from and to Nigeria; Ghana has cried out, inferring intimidation as they claimed Nigeria goods continue to enter the soil of Ghana while Ghana goods are not allowed to enter Nigeria among other complaints.

Comptroller-General of Customs, Hammed Ali, who spoke for the FG disclosed this when he visited Maigatari border in Jigawa State.

“Most of the criminals are not citizens of Nigeria. They come in at will and go out at will because our borders are so porous. They come and create havoc and disappear.

“This is why the President directed that we should go on and embark on this drill to ensure that we put into place a proper procedure for in and outflow of people.

“We must also get our neighbours to agree with us on the protocols of transit routes.”

He concluded his briefing with a line which many Nigerians considered hilarious. He said “Nigeria has enough food”, stressing that the country will ensure its borders are no longer porous.

Meanwhile, in towns, creeks, hinterlands and remote parts of the country, homes and families lament the adverse effect of the border closure as rice, the staple food of most Nigerian homes, has gone beyond the reach of not a few families.

The Boss investigation reveals that the Seme Border along the Badagry Expressway, has remained firmly under lock and key with security agencies, especially heavily armed military personnel and customs official parading the vicinity. A Seme border source said the security continue to apprehend dire devil smugglers and seizing their merchandise.

Most traders that ply the route complained the unfair treatment of the government in locking down borders, thereby depriving them of legitimate means of livelihood.

“I am a rice dealer. I buy from across the border and move them in legitimately, clearing through customs and other relevant agencies before getting passage. I know there are other criminals in the business who are not involved in the business of legitimacy. But the government should not have punished everybody for the sin of a few,” the trader, who identified himself simply as Ossy said.

He hinted that as a family man, he has been rendered unproductive, and things have become so terrible.

“At the moment, I can hardly feed my family, and swapping to a new kind of business has not been easy. The government should as a matter of urgency review the policy that necessitated the closure.

The trader argued that as a government, there should be a way of handling and dealing with criminally minded people without punishing the general public.

Mr Okechukwu Nwaibe is a transporter, who ply the Badagry/Seme route to take traders to and fro their businesses. He lamented that for the two months the border has been on lock down, he has not earned a coin. This is as activities of traders along the route has not only reduced but has become non-existent. He told The Boss in a voice full of emotion that life has become very unbearable.

 

It is not only those that ply their trade along the route that are complaining; the consumers of the grain, whose homes have been stripped of their staple food are lamenting more than loudly.

Rice is one food Nigerians keep in the house both for sustenance and emergency purposes. This is because it can be cooked with next to nothing and enjoyed on a low key and one will still be satisfied. The way the food come in handy when needed has made it the food of choice in most average Nigerian homes. Some consume it on a daily triangular basis, and that explains the reason behind the biting scourge as it has suddenly becomes scarce.

Hear Ladeinde Adegoke who works with a privately owned firm:

“I have three children, and if you add my wife, my wife’s niece staying with us and myself, that makes it six mouths to feed. I earn N60, 000 salary on a monthly basis with nothing else attached; no bonus of any kind irrespective of the season. So I have always managed to get a bag of rice for the family to manage on a monthly basis, but now, it has become something else. The price, if you ever find the product, is not affordable. This is what children takes to school every morning, and it has become increasingly difficult to sustain the family. The government is practically taking us back to the early days of Buhari when people had to buy a bag of rice for as high as N25,000,” he said.

Mr Adegoke’s story is the same in virtually every average Nigerian home. Most workers, who are on N100,000 salary and below has been on the receiving end. Even high profile businessmen are not spared as the spiraling effect continue to trickle down.

The Boss’ trip to the Okoko market on the Badagry Expressway where rice sellers converge was met with silence and forlorn faces. Most of the traders said they can no longer find the product to sell, and those who managed to get it has put the price beyond reach.

“As you can see, my shop is empty; I doubt if there is a better reason for closing the border if not to subject the common Nigerians to perpetual suffering. Can you imagine that Customs officials even raided over stores, where we used to pack the products, and carted away consignments in our possession. These were goods we had long before the borders were closed. Honestly, I don’t believe the government is checking anything; they just want to put us through unbearable hardship,” Mama Blessed, a rice seller said.

A very angry respondent, who refused to volunteer his name said “please help me ask them which rice Buhari, Oshiomhole and all of them eat in their homes. This is pure hypocrisy.”

In the meantime, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) has appealed to the Nigerian government to reopen the borders, even as the Chairman of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), Comrade Adams Oshiomhole, has said that the borders will not  be opened until certain ‘measures’ are put in place.

The ECOWAS warned that the partial closing of border crossings to Benin and Niger, which prevents the free movement of people, is a violation of agreements signed by Nigeria.

“The closure of the Nigerian borders with Benin more than a month ago, and [with] Niger more recently, [are] a hindrance to the achievement of the Community’s main objective, which is to achieve the creation of a prosperous, borderless West African region where peace and harmony prevail,” the speaker of the Parliament, Moustapha Cisse Lo, said.

It is on record that President Muhammadu Buhari made agriculture and food surplus a policy of his administration on assumption in 2015. This, the government believe will reduce dependence on crude oil and create other means of obtaining foreign exchange. Also, rice and palm oil have been the agricultural product with the greater consideration.

But much as records show that there is increase in local rice production, as reflected between 2013 and 2017, there seems not to be enough to meet the demand of the over 200 million population.

The inability to meet up in addition to stringent import control measures, have kept the price of rice high and led to rampant smuggling of rice across borders.

But while the Nigerian government maintained that the border closure is yielding results, impounding bags of imported rice, Nigerians are asking to whom are the results beneficial.

Speaking to some Nigerians who said they are also feeling the pangs of the border closure, the Boss discovered that some are willing to see the end of the closure and what it portends.

“I think it is a good venture if the intentions are pure. This is because we need a check of this nature because we import almost everything we use in this country including things we can easily produce. Maybe, we will endure the suffering for a few more weeks and then, we fall back to our own products,” Frank Onyeije reasoned.

But in his reaction, the President, Nigeria-Slovakia Chambers of Commerce, Mr. Vitalis Njoku, said the closure would have made more sense if it was all encompassing, and not restricted to the Seme Border, and later to the border connecting Niger Republic. He reiterated that while these borders remained manned because they are structured, other borders are working at full force with little or no restriction.

He was of the view that there is no economic sense in closing borders to stop smuggling or the likes when there is not enough commodity for the populace, saying there can be two reasons for the closure 1. the need to impoverish a certain class of Nigerians and 2. to further enrich a certain class of Nigerians.

“It is laughable to say that the government closed the borders to improve the economy; which economy? There is hardly something you can call economy in this country. The closure as far as I am concerned is a calculated attempt to enrich some and impoverish some. Right now, the prices of food have sky-rocked. This is not about rice. Almost every product…everyone blames the hike in products to ‘closure of border’ and the ordinary man is paying through his nose to buy essentials,” Mr. Njoku said.

The entrepreneur hinted that there is every livelihood that the borders, especially the Lagos corridor, was closed on the insistence of the richest man in Africa, saying that the borders break his monopoly of the food items.

“There is a Dangote connection to this closure saga. Dangote is practically the greatest beneficiary to the closure; he is the one selling his products easily now, at whatever price he deems fit. Recall that he once complained about the importation of most things in the country through the Seme border. He once said, ‘having a neighbour like Benin Republic is bad luck’. The way it is now, the common man is suffering, and the elites don’t care. That is why the likes of Oshiomhole will canvass for continuous closure. They can afford whatever item at whatever price, but can the regular Nigerian?” he queried.

Mr. Njoku also noted that the government policy has heightened crime in the society as many who has been rendered jobless had ‘to do something by all means’. It was also discovered that very poor quality local rice are being re-bagged in foreign rice and sold at the price of foreign rice.

He advised the government to as a matter of urgency reopen the borders as very innocent Nigerians are at the receiving end. Not a few Nigerians fear that a bag of rice is likely to cost as high as N40/45, 000 by December.

In the midst of the confusion, Nigerians are asking ‘where does the seized rice go?’

Continue Reading
Advertisement


Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headlines

Tinubu Nominates Ibas, Dambazau, Enang, Ohakim As Ambassadors

Published

on

President Bola Tinubu has nominated Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas, the immediate past sole administrator of Rivers State and a former Chief of Naval Staff, as a non-career ambassador.

Tinubu also nominated Ita Enang, a former senator; Chioma Ohakim, former First Lady of Imo State; and Abdulrahman Dambazau, former Minister of Interior and ex-Chief of Army Staff, as non-career ambassadors.

Continue Reading

Headlines

US Moves to Impose Visa Restrictions on Sponsors, Supporters of Violence in Nigeria

Published

on

The United States Department of State on Wednesday announced that it is outlining new measures to address violence against Christians in Nigeria and other countries.

The policy, according to a statement released by the department, targets radical Islamic terrorists, Fulani ethnic militias, and other actors responsible for killings and attacks on religious communities.

“The United States is taking decisive action in response to the mass killings and attacks on Christians carried out by radical Islamic terrorists, Fulani militias, and other violent groups in Nigeria and beyond,” said Secretary of State Marco Rubio in a statement.

According to the statement, a new policy under Section 212(a)(3)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act allows the State Department to restrict visas for individuals who have “directed, authorised, significantly supported, participated in, or carried out violations of religious freedom,” and, when appropriate, extend those “restrictions to their immediate family members.”

It stated that, as President Donald Trump made clear, the “United States cannot stand by while such atrocities are happening in Nigeria, and numerous other countries.”
Rubio noted that the visa restrictions could be applied “to Nigeria and any other governments or individuals engaged in violations of religious freedom.”
The announcement followed a briefing by US House Republicans on Tuesday, highlighting rising religious violence in Nigeria.
The session was convened at the direction of President Donald Trump, who instructed the House Appropriations Committee on October 31 to investigate what he described as the slaughter of Christians in the country.

The briefing, led by House Appropriations Vice Chair and National Security Subcommittee Chairman Mario Díaz-Balart, included members of the House Appropriations and House Foreign Affairs Committees, as well as religious freedom experts.

Participants included Representatives Robert Aderholt, Riley Moore, Brian Mast, Chris Smith, US Commission on International Religious Freedom Chair Vicky Hartzler, Alliance Defending Freedom International’s Sean Nelson, and Dr Ebenezer Obadare of the Council on Foreign Relations.

President Bola Tinubu recently approved Nigeria’s delegation to the new US–Nigeria Joint Working Group, formed to implement security agreements from high-level talks in Washington led by National Security Adviser Nuhu Ribadu.

The move follows growing concerns over terrorism, banditry, and targeted attacks on Christians in Nigeria, prompting increased US scrutiny and warnings about the protection of vulnerable faith communities.

On November 20, the US House Subcommittee on Africa opened a public hearing to review Trump’s redesignation of Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern, placing the country under heightened scrutiny for alleged religious-freedom violations.

Lawmakers examined the potential consequences of the designation, which could pave the way for sanctions against Nigerian officials found complicit in religious persecution.

The Punch

Continue Reading

Headlines

Alleged Christian Genocide: US Lawmakers Fault Tinubu’s Govt

Published

on

United States of America lawmakers have sharply contradicted the Nigerian government’s position on the ongoing massacres in the country, describing the violence as “escalating,” “targeted,” and overwhelmingly directed at Christians during a rare joint congressional briefing on Tuesday.

The closed-door session – convened by House Appropriations, Vice Chair Mario Díaz-Balart, as part of a Trump-ordered investigation – examined recent killings and what Congress calls Abuja’s deeply inadequate” response.

President Trump has asked lawmakers, led by Reps. Riley Moore and Tom Cole, to compile a report on persecution of Nigerian Christians and has even floated the possibility of U.S. military action against Islamist groups responsible for the attacks.

At the briefing, Vicky Hartzler, chair of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, warned that “religious freedom [is] under siege” in Nigeria, citing mass abductions of schoolchildren and assaults in which radical Muslims kill entire Christian villages [and] burn churches.” She said abuses were rampant” and “violent,” claiming Christians are targeted “at a 2.2 to 1 ratecompared with Muslims.

While acknowledging Nigeria’s recent move to reassign 100,000 police officers from VIP protection, Hartzler said the country is entering a “coordinated and deeply troubling period of escalated violence.” She urged targeted sanctions, visa bans, asset freezes and tighter conditions on U.S. aid, insisting Abuja must retake villages seized from Christian communities so displaced widows and children can return home.

The strongest rebuke came from Dr. Ebenezer Obadare of the Council on Foreign Relations, who dismissed Abuja’s narrative that the killings are not religiously motivated. He called the idea that extremists attack Muslims and Christians equally a “myth,” stressing the groups operate “for one reason and one reason only: religion.” Higher Muslim casualty figures, he argued, reflect geography, not equal targeting.

Obadare described Boko Haram as fundamentally anti-democratic and accused the Nigerian military of being “too corrupt and incompetent” to defeat jihadist networks without external pressure. He urged Washington to push Nigeria to disband armed religious militias, confront security-sector corruption and respond swiftly to early warnings.

Sean Nelson of ADF International called Nigeria “the deadliest country in the world for Christians,” claiming more Christians are killed there than in all other countries combined and at a rate “five times” higher than Muslims when adjusted for population. He said extremists also kill Muslims who reject violent ideologies, undermining Abuja’s argument that the crisis is driven mainly by crime or communal disputes.
He pressed for tighter oversight on U.S. aid, recommending that some assistance be routed through faith-based groups to avoid corruption. Without “transparency and outside pressure,” he said, “nothing changes.”

Díaz-Balart criticised the Biden administration’s reversal of Trump’s designation of Nigeria as a “country of particular concern” in 2021, saying the decision had “clearly deadly consequences.” Lawmakers from the Appropriations, Foreign Affairs and Financial Services committees signaled further oversight actions as they prepare the Trump-directed report.

Hartzler pointed to recent comments by Nigeria’s Speaker of the House acknowledging a “coordinated and deeply troubling period of escalated violence,” calling it a rare moment of candor. She also welcomed the redeployment of police officers as “a promising start after years of neglect.”

But she stressed that these gestures are far from sufficient, insisting the Nigerian government must demonstrate a real commitment to “quell injustice,” act swiftly on early warnings, and embrace transparency.

The Nigerian Embassy did not immediately respond to a request for comment, according to source.

Continue Reading