Opinion
Opinion: 2019 Election Petitions: The Judiciary Can Help Sanitize Nigerian Electoral System
- /home/rhoncare/pointblank.ng/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 27
https://pointblank.ng/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Federal-High-Court-Lagos_large.jpg&description=Opinion: 2019 Election Petitions: The Judiciary Can Help Sanitize Nigerian Electoral System', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
- Share
- Tweet /home/rhoncare/pointblank.ng/wp-content/plugins/mvp-social-buttons/mvp-social-buttons.php on line 69
https://pointblank.ng/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Federal-High-Court-Lagos_large.jpg&description=Opinion: 2019 Election Petitions: The Judiciary Can Help Sanitize Nigerian Electoral System', 'pinterestShare', 'width=750,height=350'); return false;" title="Pin This Post">
By Raymond Nkannebe; Esq.
With the limitation period for the presentation of petitions flowing from the just concluded Presidential and National Assembly elections having closed a fortnight ago, and those of gubernatorial and Houses of Assembly elections closing on the 1st of April, 2019 save for states and local constituencies where supplementary elections were held on the 23rd of March, 2019, it is safe to conclude that the politicians have had their day under the proverbial sun, and have now passed the ball into the court of the judiciary who must now get to work in the next one year at least to determine the catalogue of petitions that have proceeded from the womb of the 2019 elections which in many ways brought to full glare and national embarrassment, the weakness of our electoral process. So bad was it, that some segment of the civil society posit that it is arguably the worst election to have been conducted in Nigeria since the dawn of uninterrupted democracy in 1999.
Contrary to the situation in 2015, the victory of president Muhammadu Buhari is today a subject of litigation. Whereas former president Goodluck Jonathan made the now famous phone call to his opponent candidate Muhammadu Buhari when it became crystal clear that he was on the wrong side of the ballot, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar rightly or wrongly depending on the individual’s political bias, has decided to challenge the re-election of Muhammadu Buhari in court.
In a 147-page petition filed on his behalf by a battery of very senior and distinguished members of the bar, Atiku and his Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), are asking that the result of the election as announced by the electoral umpire, INEC be nullified, and their candidate returned. According to them from what one gathers from the well laid out petition, on a proper computation of results from the polling units, it was the PDP and their candidate Atiku Abubakar, and not Muhammadu Buhari who won the election. They have made a heavy weather of having evidences which support this proposition particularly the smart card reader data from all the polling units across the country transmitted to INEC’s back-end server during the course of the polls.
Beyond Atiku’s petition, a staggering 736 petitions challenging one election or the other, have been received by the election petition tribunals inaugurated by the acting Chief Justice of Nigeria, Tanko Muhammad, two weeks before the conduct of the election. This number understandably could increase as the final collation of results by INEC in Rivers state last week, has seen some candidates and their political parties angling to challenge the return of incumbent Governor Nyesom Wike.
The climate of rigging and manipulation of election results in Nigeria added to the undue militarization of the electoral process by the incumbents who are often in control of the security apparatus often necessitates the challenge of elections by Petitioners on a number of grounds that have been laid down by the electoral law namely, that the person whose election is being challenged was not qualified to contest the election ab initio; or that the winner of the election did not score the majority of lawful votes cast at the election. Others are that the questioned election is invalid by reason of corrupt practices or non-compliance with the provisions of the Act; or that the Petitioner was validly nominated but was unlawfully excluded from contesting in the election by the electoral umpire. See section 138(1) )(a-d) of the Electoral Act, 2010 (as amended).
It is however not in the fleshing out of the grounds of the petition and the particulars in support of same that the Petitioners often run into a problem but in the leading of evidence to establish to the required degree of proof, the often serious allegations contained in most petitions such that could eventuate into a return of the petitioner by the tribunal as was recently seen in the Osun state election petition tribunal which nullified the victory of incumbent governor Gboyega Oyetola in favour of Senator Ademola Adeleke. This writer however understands that decision is a subject of appeal at the Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja.
A holistic appraisal of the election petitions that have made their way to our courts and/or election tribunals as far back as the cases of Omoboriowo v Ajasin (1984) 1 SCNLR 108; Obih v Mbakwe (1984) LPELR-2712 (SC); Nwobodo v Onoh (1984) 1 SC 1; Buhari v INEC (2008) 19 NWLR (pt. 1120); Ojukwu v Obasanjo (2006) (EPR) 242 to name a few, will readily reveal the near impossibility of upturning an election through the courts. A petitioner almost always finds himself contending with a large body of case law and statutory provisions that literally excuses and/or explains away the electoral infractions complained of in his petition. Save for a handful of cases where a petitioner was returned through the tribunals, thousands of petitions go to court at every election cycle without any success. Perhaps the circumstances of the 2007 general election puts the difficulties faced by a petitioner in proper context. Despite the winner of that very controversial election acknowledging that the process which brought him to power was fraught with widespread irregularities and gross manipulation of the electoral process, it is ironical to say the least, that the challenge of that election at the presidential election tribunal by then General Muhammadu Buhari came to nought. Such is the lot of the Petitioner.
The sad consequence(s) of this is that it has helped to fester the culture of rigging across board. The Nigerian politician having understood how difficult it is to upturn an election through the courts, has devised even more brazen and disingenuous means of rigging him or herself into power and thereafter, dare their opponent to go to court to challenge the victory. Anyone who has had the privilege of studying the electoral forms from our shambolic elections will readily come to terms with the fact that elections in Nigeria are basically a riggers affair. It is the candidate who is able to out-rig the other through any means whatsoever that is often declared the winner thus making a mockery of our democracy.
In a bold attempt however to improve the sanctity and integrity of our electoral process and to the credit of former chairman of the electoral commission Alhaji Attahiru Jega, the smart card reader was introduced in the 2015 general election to checkmate the recurrent problem of multiple accreditation of voters against the spirit of the voters register. The genus of the smart card reader machine was to ensure that only bio-metrically accredited voters could cast valid ballots at the polling booths. It was thought that it would solve the recurrent problem of multiple thumbprinting by unscrupulous elements who lend themselves to politicians who prostitute the electoral process.
But the legality of the smart card reader as an instrument for the conduct of elections was to evolve into a serious constitutional debate on the back of the petitions that made it to the election tribunals following that round of elections. In the case of Nyesom v Peterside (2014) 5 NWLR (pt. 1430) 377 a full-bench of the apex Court despite acknowledging the motive behind the introduction and use of the card reader machine in an election, which needless to say was to bolster the democratic norm of “one man one vote”, went ahead to strike it down for having derived its efficacy from the INEC guidelines which obviously was in conflict with section 49(2) of the Electoral Act 2010 (as amended) which nominates the voters register as the instrument of accreditation of voters and proof of over-voting by a person challenging an election.
In answering the question whether failure to use card reader for accreditation of voters can invalidate an election, the apex Court Per. AKA’AHS held instructively as follows, “the introduction of the card reader is certainly a welcome development in the electoral process. Although it is meant to improve on the integrity of those accredited to vote so as to check the incidence of rigging, it is yet to be made part of the Electoral Act. Section 138(2) envisages a situation where the Electoral Commission issues instruction or guidelines which are not carried out. The failure of the card reader machine, or failure to use it for the accreditation of voters cannot invalidate an election. The section provides as follows: “138(2) an act or omission which may be contrary to an instruction or directive of the Commission or of an officer appointed for the purpose of election but which is not contrary to the provisions of this Act shall not of itself be a ground for questioning the election”.
With the above sentiments of the apex Court, many of the petitioners who went to court in the last cycle of election hoping to make a case out of the non-use of the smart card readers in the accreditation of voters at the polling units found themselves on the wrong side of the law, and severally paid with a dismissal of their petitions. Unfortunately, none of the petitioners drew the attention of the apex Court to the amendment of section 49 (2) of the Electoral Act which was signed into law by former president Goodluck Jonathan on the 20th of March, 2015, just 8 days before the holding of the general election. On their part too, the judex did not take judicial notice of this amendment to the principal Act which legitimized the use of the smart card reader for voter accreditation; the very basis upon which the Court upheld all the disputed governorship elections conducted by the INEC on April 11, 2015.
Having said that, the 2019 elections and the petitions trailing it, provides another window of judicial activism for the judiciary which has the potency of revolutionizing our electoral process and by extension, our nascent democracy. With the countrywide criticisms that have greeted the conduct of the just concluded general elections ranging from selective use of the smart card reader machines in some places and the outright thumbprinting of ballot papers in the quarters of party chieftains and what not, in a barefaced prostitution of our electoral process, suffice it to say that the ball is effectively in the Court of the judiciary to rise up to the occasion in ensuring that not a single illegal vote counts in the return of a candidate.
A simple way to do this, is to ensure the fulsome recognition of the data from the smart card reader machines and using same as a benchmark for reconciling the total votes cast in a polling unit so as to check against over-voting which was perpetrated by politicians with reckless abandon in the just concluded 2019 elections. In places where the smart card reader machines malfunctioned and thus were not used, the tribunals must ensure that the procedure enumerated by the electoral umpire on how voters in such polling units should cast their votes, was applied to the latter. Anything otherwise, must of necessity lead to the cancellation of the results from such unit as consecrated by the relevant provision of the Electoral Act 2010 (as amended), and the Guidelines of the electoral commission 2019. Thankfully, the apex Court in the Nyesom v Peterside case (supra) acknowledges that the innovation of the smart card reader machines was well intentioned in that, it was calculated to improve the integrity of our elections. The petitions that are now lying before the several election petition tribunals across the country, provides an opportunity for the judex to uphold the smart card reader machine and lend it the much needed judicial imprimatur which counted against its usage in the last cycle of elections, irrespective of the consequences for the individual poll where it is applied.
At a time when it has been shown that the executive and the legislature are enmeshed in a dark conspiracy to the detriment of our democracy, such as was seen in the circumstances under which assent to the Electoral Act Amendment Bill (2018) was refused by president Muhammadu Buhari, the judiciary can step in, in its hallowed capacity as the avowed defender of any democracy to sanitize our electoral system. This is what Nigerians who are increasingly losing confidence in our electoral process earnestly asks of the judiciary.
Raymond Nkannebe; a legal practitioner writes from Lagos.
By Tolulope A. Adegoke
Manners are the scaffolding; character is the structure; legacy is the edifice. Build not for the applause of the present, but for the shelter of generations yet unborn. For every handshake plants a seed, every word echoes through time, and every glance holds the power to heal or to harm. Lead as though the universe is watching—because it is.
Introduction: The Unfinished Symphony of Leadership
The first articulation of The Diplomacy of Dignity established a foundational truth: that manners yield manna, that character is the key to every door, and that access is a privilege demanding profound respect. Yet, as with all profound truths, the initial revelation is but the threshold to a vast and unexplored continent.
Part II does not merely revisit these principles; it transcends them. It moves beyond the mechanics of mannerism to the metaphysics of influence. It transitions from teaching leaders how to behave to illuminating why such behavior shapes the very fabric of organizational and societal reality.
This expanded treatise posits that leadership is not merely a role but a sacred stewardship—a temporary custodianship of human potential, organizational resources, and societal trust. When manners are practiced as a spiritual discipline, when cultural intelligence evolves into cultural wisdom, and when access is governed by an unshakeable ethical compass, leadership ceases to be a transactional exchange and becomes a transformative covenant.
Part II is crafted for the leader who has mastered the basics and now seeks the sublime. It is for the mentor who wishes to leave a legacy, the executive who desires to build institutions that outlast them, and the human being who yearns to contribute to the flourishing of all.
Part I: The Metaphysics of Mannerism—Beyond Behavior to Being
1.1 The Ontology of Conduct
To understand the deepest essence of manners, we must move beyond the behavioral to the ontological—beyond what we do to who we are. Manners are not a superficial veneer applied to a pre-existing self; they are the very process through which the self is continually forged and revealed.
In existential philosophy, existence precedes essence—we are what we make of ourselves through our choices. In the realm of leadership, mannerism precedes identity. The leader who consistently practices patience becomes patient. The leader who consistently practices gratitude becomes grateful. The leader who consistently practices humility becomes humble. Conduct is not the expression of character; it is the crucible in which character is refined.
The Mirror Principle: Every interaction is a mirror reflecting back to the leader the state of their own soul. When a leader treats a subordinate with disdain, they are not diminishing the subordinate; they are diminishing themselves. When a leader treats a rival with generosity, they are not weakening their position; they are strengthening their spirit. The ontological truth is this: how you treat the least among you is how you treat your own soul.
1.2 The Physics of Human Connection
Science affirms what philosophy has long intuited: human beings are interconnected in ways that transcend the physical. The phenomenon of emotional contagion—the transmission of affect from one individual to another—is a well-documented neurological reality. Mirror neurons fire not only when we perform an action but when we observe another performing it. We are, quite literally, wired for empathy.
This neuroscientific reality elevates manners from mere social convention to biological imperative. A leader’s demeanor is not a private affair; it is a public health issue for the organization. A leader who radiates calm, respect, and optimism literally rewires the neural architecture of their team toward creativity and resilience. A leader who radiates anxiety, contempt, and pessimism rewires their team toward fear, defensiveness, and burnout.
The Leadership Ecosystem: Organizations are not machines; they are ecosystems. In an ecosystem, every action has a ripple effect. A single act of incivility from a leader can cascade downward, infecting entire departments with distrust and disengagement. Conversely, a single act of genuine acknowledgment can multiply into a culture of appreciation that permeates every level of the hierarchy.
Part II: Cultural Wisdom—The Evolution of Cultural Intelligence
2.1 From Cultural Intelligence to Cultural Wisdom
Cultural Intelligence (CI) is the capacity to function effectively across diverse cultural contexts. It is, as established in Part I, a critical competency for the modern leader. Yet, CI alone is insufficient. It is possible to be culturally intelligent and yet culturally indifferent—to understand the rules of engagement without genuinely caring about the people involved.
Cultural Wisdom (CW) is the transcendence of CI. It is CI infused with compassion, humility, and a profound respect for the inherent dignity of every cultural expression. Cultural Wisdom asks not merely, “What is the appropriate behavior in this context?” but rather, “What is the honorable behavior in this context? What will honor the humanity of this person while respecting the integrity of their tradition?”
2.2 The Three Dimensions of Cultural Wisdom
Cognitive Wisdom:
Definition: The deep understanding of cultural patterns, not as stereotypes but as living, evolving narratives.
Leadership Application: The leader studies not just the customs but the stories—the historical wounds, the collective aspirations, the unspoken anxieties of the cultures they navigate.
Affective Wisdom:
Definition: The capacity to genuinely feel respect, empathy, and solidarity across cultural boundaries.
Leadership Application: The leader does not merely perform respect; they cultivate it. They engage in practices (reading, travel, dialogue) that expand their emotional repertoire.
Behavioral Wisdom:
Definition: The ability to adapt behavior with authenticity, not as a chameleon but as a bridge-builder.
Leadership Application: The leader adapts not to manipulate but to connect. Their adaptation is transparent and grounded in genuine regard for the other.
2.3 The Dangers of Cultural Narcissism
When leaders possess CI without CW, they risk descending into cultural narcissism—the belief that one’s own cultural framework is superior, and that cultural adaptation is merely a strategic tool to achieve one’s own ends. The culturally narcissistic leader learns the rituals of another culture not to honor it, but to exploit it.
The Antidote: Genuine curiosity. The culturally wise leader approaches every cultural encounter as a student, not a conqueror. They ask questions that betray a desire to understand, not to judge. They listen to understand, not to respond. They are perpetually aware that their own cultural lens is but one among many, and that true wisdom lies in the humility to learn.
Part III: The Geometry of Access—Understanding the Architecture of Opportunity
3.1 Access as a Multi-Dimensional Construct
Part I established that access is a privilege, not a right. Part II expands this understanding by examining the geometry of access—its multiple dimensions and the complex dynamics that govern it.
Access exists on three planes:
1. Vertical Access: The ability to reach upward in the hierarchy—to speak with senior leaders, to influence strategic decisions, to access resources and information.
2. Horizontal Access: The ability to connect across silos—to collaborate with peers in different functions, geographies, or disciplines.
3. Inner Access: The most profound but most neglected dimension—the ability to access one’s own inner resources, including self-awareness, emotional regulation, and moral clarity.
3.2 The Paradox of Access
The paradox of access is this: the more access one has, the more one must constrain its use. The leader with unfettered access to information, resources, and decision-making power must exercise the greatest restraint. Unconstrained access inevitably corrupts. It breeds entitlement, blinds the leader to alternative perspectives, and creates a detachment from the lived realities of those without such access.
The Access Protocol: Wise leaders develop an internal protocol governing their use of access. This protocol asks:
· Is this access necessary for the common good, or merely convenient for my personal agenda?
· Am I using this access to elevate others or to aggrandize myself?
· Am I remaining connected to the realities of those without this access?
3.3 The Democratization of Access in the Digital Age
The digital age has fundamentally transformed the geometry of access. Social media, instant messaging, and virtual collaboration tools have flattened hierarchies and created unprecedented opportunities for connection. Yet, this democratization brings its own dangers:
The Illusion of Intimacy:
Digital access creates the illusion of closeness without the substance of relationship. A leader may have thousands of LinkedIn connections and yet have no genuine human bonds.
The Tyranny of the Urgent:
Constant access creates constant pressure. Leaders find themselves tethered to their devices, responding to endless demands on their time and attention.
The Erosion of Boundaries:
Digital access erodes the boundaries between professional and personal life, work and rest, public and private self.
The Antidote: Intentional digital discipline. The wise leader establishes protocols for digital engagement—scheduled times for email review, boundaries around after-hours communication, and intentional practices of disconnection for reflection and renewal.
Part IV: The Architecture of Honor—Building Institutions of Dignity
4.1 Honor as Organizational Infrastructure
In Part I, we explored honor as a personal attribute. In Part II, we elevate honor to the level of organizational infrastructure. An institution that is built on honor does not merely rely on the good character of its individual members; it embeds honor into its systems, processes, and culture.
The Pillars of an Honor-Based Institution:
Transparency:
Description: Openness in decision-making, communication, and resource allocation.
Tangible Manifestation: Publicly accessible meeting minutes, clear criteria for promotions, transparent budget processes.
Accountability:
Description: Systems that hold all members—especially leaders—accountable for their conduct.
Tangible Manifestation: Independent ethics committees, anonymous reporting mechanisms, clear consequences for misconduct.
Civility:
Description: A culture that expects and reinforces respectful interaction.
Tangible Manifestation: Codes of conduct, civility training, recognition programs for exemplary behavior.
Inclusion:
Description: Active efforts to ensure all voices are heard and valued.
Tangible Manifestation: Diverse hiring practices, inclusive meeting protocols, mentorship programs for underrepresented groups.
Restoration:
Description: Processes for repairing harm and restoring relationships after conflicts.
Tangible Manifestation: Mediation programs, restorative justice practices, pathways for forgiveness and reconciliation.
4.2 The Economics of Honor
Honor is not merely an ethical aspiration; it is an economic imperative. Organizations that embed honor into their infrastructure consistently outperform those that do not. The data is compelling:
Lower Turnover: Employees in honor-based cultures report significantly higher job satisfaction and are less likely to leave.
Higher Productivity: Trust and respect reduce friction, enabling faster decision-making and more effective collaboration.
Better Reputation: Honor-based organizations attract top talent, loyal customers, and supportive investors.
Greater Resilience: When crises occur—and they always do—honor-based organizations navigate them with greater integrity and emerge with their reputations intact.
4.3 The Cost of Dishonor
Conversely, the cost of dishonor is staggering. Organizations that tolerate incivility, abuse of access, and ethical lapses pay a heavy price:
Legal and Regulatory Fines: Ethical breaches often result in financial penalties.
Reputational Damage: Loss of trust among customers, employees, and the public.
Talent Drain: High-performing employees are the first to leave toxic cultures.
Internal Dysfunction: Fear and mistrust create silos, stifle innovation, and breed mediocrity.
Part V: The Temporality of Leadership—Legacy and the Long View
5.1 The Arc of Leadership
Leadership is not a moment; it is an arc that stretches across time. The wise leader understands that their tenure is but a brief chapter in the ongoing story of their organization, their community, and their family. This temporal awareness fundamentally transforms how they lead.
The Five Horizons of Leadership:
Horizon 1: Immediate (Days)
Focus: Operational effectiveness, crisis management.
Horizon 2: Short-term (Months)
Focus: Goal achievement, performance optimization.
Horizon 3: Medium-term (Years)
Focus: Strategic positioning, organizational development.
Horizon 4: Long-term (Decades)
Focus: Institutional legacy, succession planning.
Horizon 5: Eternal (Generations)
Focus: Contribution to human flourishing, enduring values.
The leader who operates only in Horizons 1 and 2 is a manager, not a leader. The leader who reaches Horizon 5 understands that their ultimate responsibility is to leave the world—and their organization—better than they found it.
5.2 The Succession Imperative
One of the deepest expressions of honor in leadership is the commitment to succession. The leader who genuinely cares about their organization does not cling to power; they cultivate their successors. They invest time and resources in developing the next generation of leaders, ensuring that the institution’s values and capabilities are preserved and enhanced.
The Succession Protocol:
Identify: Actively seek out talent, recognizing potential in unexpected places.
Mentor: Invest deeply in the development of emerging leaders, sharing wisdom and experience.
Empower: Delegate real authority, allowing successors to learn through experience.
Release: When the time is right, step aside with grace, supporting the transition with humility and generosity.
5.3 The Unwritten Legacy
The most enduring legacy a leader leaves is not written in annual reports or etched on plaques; it is written in the hearts and minds of those they have touched. The leader who remembers names, who acknowledges efforts, who offers encouragement in moments of doubt—this leader leaves a legacy that no financial report can capture.
The Test of Legacy: In twenty years, when your tenure is a distant memory, what will people remember about you? Will they remember your financial results, or will they remember how you made them feel? Will they remember your titles, or will they remember your kindness? Will they remember your speeches, or will they remember your silences—the times you listened when it would have been easier to speak?
Part VI: The Ethical Laboratory—Navigating the Complexities of Moral Leadership
6.1 The Landscape of Ethical Dilemmas
Leadership is inevitably conducted in the gray spaces between absolutes. The wise leader must navigate a landscape of ethical dilemmas that defy simple solutions. These dilemmas arise when:
Values Conflict: The leader must choose between two equally valid but incompatible principles.
Stakeholders Diverge: The leader must make decisions that benefit some while disadvantaging others.
Information is Incomplete: The leader must act without full knowledge of consequences.
Long-term and Short-term Clash: The leader must balance immediate needs against future consequences.
6.2 The Compass of Ethical Decision-Making
In navigating these dilemmas, the leader requires a reliable compass—a set of principles that provide direction even when the map is unclear.
The Compass Principles:
1. The Dignity Principle: Every decision must respect the inherent dignity of every human being affected.
2. The Transparency Principle: Decisions should be made with the maximum possible transparency, with clear communication of reasoning and trade-offs.
3. The Accountability Principle: Leaders must be willing to be held accountable for the consequences of their decisions.
4. The Humility Principle: Leaders must recognize the limits of their own wisdom and be open to correction and alternative perspectives.
5. The Legacy Principle: Decisions should be evaluated not only by their immediate impact but by their long-term consequences for the organization and society.
6.3 The Practice of Moral Courage
Ethical leadership requires not only wisdom but courage—the willingness to act on one’s principles even when it is costly. Moral courage is the bridge between ethical insight and ethical action.
Barriers to Moral Courage:
Fear of retribution or career damage
Social pressure to conform
Rationalization and self-deception
The diffusion of responsibility within groups
Cultivating Moral Courage:
Preparation: Anticipate ethical dilemmas and rehearse responses in advance.
Support: Build networks of trusted colleagues who share your commitment to integrity.
Reflection: Regularly examine your decisions and motivations, seeking feedback and self-knowledge.
Practice: Start with small acts of courage; these build the capacity for larger ones.
Part VII: The Global Leader—Navigating the Multipolar World
7.1 The Context of Global Leadership
The contemporary leader operates in a world that is simultaneously interconnected and fragmented. Globalization has created unprecedented economic integration, yet geopolitical tensions, cultural conflicts, and ideological divisions persist. The global leader must navigate this complexity with sophistication and grace.
7.2 The Dimensions of Global Leadership Competence
Global Mindset:
Description: The ability to think beyond national boundaries, recognizing interconnections and systems dynamics.
Developmental Practices: Study of global history, economics, and geopolitics; engagement with diverse perspectives.
Cultural Fluency:
Description: The ability to communicate and relate effectively across cultural contexts.
Developmental Practices: Language learning, cultural immersion, cross-cultural dialogue.
Geopolitical Awareness:
Description: Understanding of the political, economic, and security dynamics shaping the global environment.
Developmental Practices: Regular engagement with global news, analysis, and expert briefings.
Ethical Universalism:
Description: Commitment to ethical principles that transcend cultural boundaries.
Developmental Practices: Study of global ethical frameworks, engagement with diverse moral traditions.
7.3 The Responsibility of Global Influence
The global leader holds a position of extraordinary influence. Their decisions affect not only their organization but communities, economies, and ecosystems around the world. This influence demands a corresponding sense of responsibility.
The Global Leadership Covenant:
As a global leader, I commit to:
· Steward the planet by making decisions that consider environmental sustainability.
· Honor human dignity by respecting the rights and aspirations of all peoples.
· Promote peace by resolving conflicts through dialogue and diplomacy.
· Reduce inequality by creating opportunities for the marginalized and excluded.
· Build bridges by fostering understanding across cultures and civilizations.
Part VIII: The Inner Citadel—Leadership and the Soul
8.1 The Neglected Dimension
In the discourse on leadership, the inner life is often neglected. We speak of competencies, strategies, and results, but rarely of the soul. Yet, the deepest source of a leader’s conduct is their internal state. The leader who is anxious, resentful, or unfulfilled will inevitably transmit these states to their organization.
8.2 The Practices of Inner Mastery
The Practice of Silence:
In a world of constant noise, the leader must cultivate the discipline of silence. Silence allows for reflection, self-awareness, and connection to deeper sources of wisdom.
The Practice of Stillness:
Beyond silence is stillness—a state of inner peace that transcends external circumstances. Stillness enables the leader to respond rather than react, to choose rather than be driven.
The Practice of Service:
The deepest paradox of leadership is that true fulfillment comes not from being served but from serving. The leader who serves with genuine humility finds a satisfaction that positional power can never provide.
The Practice of Gratitude:
In the relentless pursuit of goals, leaders often forget to pause and appreciate what they have. Gratitude is not merely pleasant; it is essential. It grounds the leader in what is good, prevents entitlement, and opens the heart to generosity.
8.3 The Integration of Inner and Outer
The ultimate task of leadership is the integration of inner and outer life. The leader who is integrated is the same person in private as in public, in moments of stress as in moments of calm, in times of success as in times of failure. This integration is not achieved overnight; it is the work of a lifetime.
The Integrated Life:
Authenticity: The integration of inner values and outer actions.
Integrity: The alignment of words and deeds.
Consistency: The manifestation of the same virtues in all contexts.
Wholeness: The recognition that professional and personal life are not separate but deeply intertwined.
Part IX: The Legacy of Dignity—A Call to Generations
9.1 The Intergenerational Covenant
Leadership is not for the present alone; it is for the future. The decisions we make today will shape the world our children and grandchildren inherit. This is the intergenerational covenant—the recognition that we are temporary stewards of a legacy that belongs to those who will come after us.
9.2 The Enduring Principles
As we conclude this expanded treatise, we return to the principles that have guided us:
1. Manners are sovereign skills.
They are not optional; they are essential to the health of organizations and societies.
2. Cultural wisdom transcends cultural intelligence.
It is knowledge infused with compassion and humility.
3. Access is a privilege to be stewarded with honor.
The leader who abuses access betrays their trust.
4. Character is the ultimate currency.
It is the foundation upon which all other leadership capabilities are built.
5. Legacy is the measure of true success.
What survives is not what we achieved but what we contributed to the flourishing of others.
9.3 The Final Charge
To the leaders of today and tomorrow:
Build institutions that honor human dignity. Create cultures where every voice is heard, every contribution valued, and every person treated with respect.
Navigate complexity with wisdom and courage. In a world of uncertainty, be an anchor of integrity. In a world of division, be a bridge of understanding.
Lead with your soul. Do not merely manage tasks; inspire hope. Do not merely execute strategies; cultivate meaning. Do not merely achieve results; build relationships that transcend transactions.
Remember the epigraph with which we began: “Manners are the scaffolding; character is the structure; legacy is the edifice.”
Your scaffolding may be invisible, but it supports everything. Your structure may be unadorned, but it must be sound. And your edifice—your legacy—will stand long after you have passed through these doors. Build wisely. Build honorably. Build for the generations yet unborn.
Conclusion: The Unfinished Work
This write-up, like leadership itself, is an unfinished work. It is a contribution to an ongoing conversation—a conversation that has been unfolding since the dawn of human civilization and will continue long after we have left the stage. You, dear reader, are not merely a recipient of this wisdom; you are an active participant in its evolution.
Your charge: Take these principles and apply them in your unique context. Adapt them to your circumstances. Test them, refine them, and contribute your own wisdom to the collective enterprise. For leadership is not a destination; it is a journey. And the journey continues with you.
The world does not need more leaders with sharper strategies; it needs leaders with softer hearts and stiffer backbones—leaders who understand that every interaction is an inheritance, and every word is a testament. This is the diplomacy of dignity. This is the architecture of influence. This is the legacy of noble leadership.
Dr. Tolulope A. Adegoke, AMBP-UN, is a globally recognized scholar-practitioner and thought leader at the nexus of security, governance, and strategic leadership. His mission is dedicated to advancing ethical governance, strategic human capital development, resilient nation-building, and global peace. He bridges the worlds of academic rigor and practical application, contributing to leadership discourse at the highest levels of policy and practice. He can be reached via: tolulopeadegoke01@gmail.com, globalstageimpacts@gmail.com
By Henry Ukazu
Dear Destiny Friends,
We are all stars, but sometimes we act like the moon and sun. Don’t get me wrong, the moon and sun are all God’s creatures, but in this context, I’m referring to the star as it relates to being a standard, an exceptional being and a leader that will set the pace for others to follow.
Being a star gives you an identity and opportunity to showcase the world what you are made of. Your star will shine when you are working on purpose. At creation, we were all created with a unique purpose which will be manifested on earth. So, it’s fair to say our purpose was made in heaven, but our assignment is on earth.
It’s instructive to note that our start is the embodiment of what makes us to be identifiable, recognizable and traceable. When our star is shining, the world stands still and observes. Isn’t it true that the world sets apart for the man who knows where he’s going.
Everyone loves a star. Imagine being the best in your class, team, or even in the family, you will be the envy of everyone. Stars attract jealousy. To understand how a star works, imagine playing soccer, despite each team having captains and star players, it’s whoever that has the ball the attention of the players, spectators and the world will be focused on because at that moment, whoever has the ball is the star, hence the reason why the person is being tackled.
Stars attract favor, blessings, opportunities, and blessings just because they are fulfilling their purpose of manifestation. As a self-discovery coach, I propounded the concept of STAR. S stands for shining, T represents Target, the A represents Action and R represents Recognition.
A brief analysis of the concept of STAR will give a proper perspective. When one is a star, one will be a shining star, and when one is a shining star, they’ll definitely be a target because the sugar will always attract ants. Because one is a star, they’ll be action oriented. A star can’t be hidden. It is the work they do that makes them noticeable which ultimately gives them recognition.
If I may ask you, are you a star? If yes, what makes you a star? Stars are a unique set of people who excel more than their counterparts or contemporaries. Stars defy human logic and understanding, especially when there is a spiritual element attached to it. While humans go to school to acquire knowledge and information, stars have inherent and intuitive knowledge which is revealed to them from God.
A little insight into the inherent and intuitive knowledge of how stars work. One’s profession is what one is trained to do in school or even taught in practice, one’s vocation is what one is paid to do like skilled work or a regular 9-5 work, while one’s ministry is where one’s talent/gift manifests their God given potential. When one is a star, both their profession, vocation and ministry will be working in alignment. They won’t have to do much to excel. Their light will gradually shine effortlessly with little or no support. A little effort by them will magnify their work.
It’s unfortunate that many stars can’t shine because many people are afraid of stepping out of their comfort zone. Some of us are afraid of what the world will say, how their message will be received, and how one can overcome these challenges if their star is not shining as it ought to. This is one of the major challenges why most people fail to activate their star. Trust me, I get it. The fears and concerns are valid. As humans we are bound to have fears, however, our desire for success should outweigh our fear for failure.
Do you know that the grave is considered the richest place on planet earth? Yes, because many talents are buried inside the grave simply because some people failed to unleash their talents, gifts and God given potentials. Here is what I will say, may we not die with what God has given to us.
Do you want to be a star? If yes, ask yourself, what makes you unique? If you discover it, say to yourself, I am a star, I am blessed. I am a child of destiny. I will fulfill my purpose. I will not die with what God has given to me. I will shine and I will possess my possession because I am a star.
Henry Ukazu writes from New York. He works with the New York City Department of Correction as the Legal Coordinator. He’s the founder of Gloemi. He’s a Transformative Human Capacity and Mindset coach. He is also a public speaker, youth advocate, creative writer and author of Design Your Destiny- Actualizing Your Birthright to Success, Unleash Your Destiny and The Six Pillars of Success . He can be reached via info@gloemi.com
By Tolulope A. Adegoke
Access is the door; character is the key. But manners—manners are the hand that turns it. Turn gently, for every lock has a master, and every master remembers the weight of your touch.
Introduction: The Alchemy of Conduct
In the lexicon of leadership, strategy, vision, and resilience are often heralded as the pillars of success. Yet, beneath these monumental structures lies a more subtle, pervasive, and ultimately decisive foundation: Manners. Far from being mere decorative pleasantries or antiquated social rituals, manners are the operational currency of human interaction. To profess that “Manners give the Manna” is to recognize a profound metaphysical and practical truth—that the quality of one’s conduct directly correlates to the abundance of opportunities, trust, and resources (the “manna”) one receives in a professional and societal context.
This write-up posits that mannerism is not merely etiquette; it is the highest form of Cultural Intelligence (CI). It is the dynamic ability to navigate diverse human ecosystems with empathy, respect, and situational awareness. True leadership, therefore, is not a position of power but a performance of character. When access is treated as a privilege rather than a right, when honor is woven into communication, and when appreciation is rendered with sincerity, the leader transforms from a manager of tasks into an architect of possibilities.
Part I: The Economics of Etiquette—Why “Manners” Yield “Manna”
The adage “Manners give the Manna” is rooted in the economics of social capital. In every organization, the “manna” represents the intangible assets that fuel success: loyalty, discretionary effort, insider information, and collaborative synergy. These are not entitlements; they are gifts granted by subordinates, peers, and superiors based on the perceived worthiness of the receiver.
· Example 1: The Executive and the Elevator. Consider a CEO who steps into a crowded elevator. Instead of ignoring the junior staff member holding the door, the CEO offers a warm acknowledgment, asks about their ongoing project by name, and thanks them for their diligence upon exiting. This 30-second interaction yields “manna” in the form of heightened morale, a sense of visibility, and a narrative of approachability that spreads through the workforce. Conversely, the CEO who stares at their phone in silence harvests resentment. The “manna” of trust is withheld.
· Example 2: The Cross-Cultural Negotiation. A Western executive negotiating with a Japanese corporation arrives early, presents a business card with both hands, and bows slightly upon receipt. This act of cultural mannerism signals profound respect for the host’s hierarchy. It bypasses transactional friction and opens the “door” to relational negotiation. The “manna” here is a contract signed with goodwill, rather than legal rigidity. The executive who ignores these rituals may win the argument but lose the relationship—and thus, the long-term “manna.”
Manners, therefore, are the lubrication that reduces the entropy of human systems. They signal predictability, safety, and mutual regard—conditions under which human beings perform optimally.
Part II: Mannerism as Cultural Intelligence (CI)
Cultural Intelligence (CI) is the capability to relate and work effectively across cultures. However, a significant oversight in contemporary CI training is the reduction of culture to nationality. Culture exists in corporate boardrooms, engineering bays, and creative studios. Mannerism is the practical application of CI.
· Understanding Context (Cognitive CI): Mannerism requires the leader to read the room. In a high-trust Scandinavian startup, mannerism might mean flat hierarchies and first-name basis communication. In a traditional Indian family-run conglomerate, mannerism demands deference to age and tenure. The leader with high CI does not impose a monolithic standard of “politeness” but adapts their behavioral code to honor the prevailing cultural architecture. This is not duplicity; it is the intelligence of adaptation.
· Managing Micro-expressions (Motivational CI): True mannerism is motivational; it stems from the genuine desire to connect. When a leader thanks a team for working late, the mannerism is not in the words “thank you,” but in the tone, the eye contact, and the subsequent action of providing a compensatory day off. This behavioral integrity speaks the universal language of respect, transcending linguistic barriers.
· The Behavioral Index (Behavioral CI): Mannerism is the observable index of one’s cultural intelligence. It is the act of listening without interrupting, the discipline of acknowledging an email within 24 hours, and the grace of giving credit in a public forum. These behaviors indicate that the leader has internalized the cultural values of fairness and dignity.
Part III: “Manners Make the Man”—The Nexus of Character and Identity
“Manners make the Man” is a declarative statement on identity. It suggests that our external conduct is not a mask but a mold—it shapes who we are. A leader who habitually practices courtesy rewires their neural pathways to default to empathy.
· The Construct of Dignity: Manners are the scaffolding of dignity. They prevent the dehumanization of the other. In high-stakes environments, where stress is prevalent, the “Man” (or person) who retains their manners retains their humanity. For instance, during a corporate restructuring, a leader with manners will lay off employees with transparent communication, severance support, and personal acknowledgment of their contributions. This leader maintains their moral standing. The leader who lacks manners treats the layoff as a statistical necessity, reducing humans to numbers. The former preserves their reputation; the latter destroys theirs.
· Character as the Key: The write-up asserts that “men are the doors, but character is the key.” In the professional realm, human beings are the gatekeepers of opportunity. The hiring manager, the client, the mentor—they are the “doors.” No amount of technical skill (the “crowbar”) will open these doors if the character (the “key”) is malformed. Character is the aggregate of one’s manners. It is the consistency of respect, the reliability of word, and the courage to be humble. A leader with impeccable character finds doors swinging open because the gatekeepers trust the hand that turns the key.
Part IV: The Sacred Trust of Access—A Privilege, Not a Right
One of the most dangerous fallacies in leadership is the conflation of access with equality. Access to the CEO, access to confidential data, or access to decision-making corridors is a privilege conferred by the organization or society. It is never an inherent right.
· The Abuse of Familiarity: When a leader assumes that because they have access to a subordinate’s time, they have the right to disregard that subordinate’s personal boundaries, they abuse the privilege. Interrupting a team member’s lunch for a non-urgent query, sending emails at midnight with the expectation of immediate replies, or using positional power to bypass protocols are all abuses of access. This behavior erodes the “manna” of goodwill and replaces it with the “mire” of burnout and attrition.
· The Illusion of Equality: Access does not equal equality. A leader may have the privilege of a private office, but they must treat the cleaner who enters that office with the same dignity as the visiting dignitary. Treating all interactions with dignified honor does not mean treating everyone identically; it means treating everyone with an equivalent standard of respect, tailored to the context. The intern deserves the leader’s full attention during a one-on-one meeting, just as the board member does. The difference is the topic, not the tone.
Part V: The Doorway to All Doors—The Practical Prescription
If “men are the doors,” and “character is the key,” then the leadership prescription is clear: invest relentlessly in the refinement of character through the daily practice of manners.
1. The Prescription of Active Listening: Leadership is often reduced to speaking, but the ultimate manner is silence—the silence that allows others to speak. In board meetings, practice the 70/30 rule: listen 70% of the time, speak 30%. When you listen, you honor the speaker’s presence. This opens the “door” to innovative ideas that the loud leader would never hear.
2. The Prescription of the Handwritten Note: In a digital age, the analog gesture carries disproportionate weight. A leader who sends a handwritten thank-you note to a retiring employee or a successful project lead demonstrates a timeless mannerism. This act of appreciation is a “key” that unlocks immense loyalty. It costs little but yields substantial “manna” in emotional currency.
3. The Prescription of Punctuality and Preparation: Manners are a form of preparation. Arriving on time for a meeting is a statement that you value the other person’s time. Preparing for a discussion shows respect for the intellectual capacity of those attending. This builds a culture of competence and mutual esteem.
4. The Prescription of Public Praise and Private Critique: Criticism must be a gift wrapped in privacy; praise must be a celebration broadcasted publicly. This is a core mannerism of leadership. It protects the dignity of the individual while elevating the standard for the team. When critique is handled with discretion, the “door” of vulnerability remains open for growth.
Part VI: The Abuses and Their Antidotes
Leadership culture across boards often suffers from the “elite syndrome”—the belief that positional power absolves one of basic courtesy.
· The Abuse of Interruption: Leaders frequently interrupt to display intellectual dominance. Antidote: Institute a “no interruption” rule in strategic meetings. Allow the speaker to complete their thought. This forces active listening and often reveals that the “interrupter” had nothing new to add.
· The Abuse of Credit: Leaders often take credit for team successes to bolster their image. Antidote: Practice the art of “Giving the Gold.” Explicitly name the contributors in external communications. When the leader gives away the credit, they gain the far greater reward of trust.
· The Abuse of Emotional Dumping: Leaders sometimes use subordinates as emotional punching bags during stressful periods. Antidote: Cultivate emotional regulation. Establish a “cooling-off” period before responding to aggravating emails or situations. The leader who controls their emotions controls the room.
Part VII: Conclusion—The Synthesis of Civility and Sovereignty
In the final analysis, manners are not soft skills; they are sovereign skills. They are the demarcation between the ruler and the tyrant, the mentor and the demagogue. The ultimate essence of leadership is found not in the magnitude of the decisions one makes, but in the dignity with which one makes them.
We must elevate the narrative: “Manners give the Manna” is not a cliché but a cognitive framework for operational excellence. “Mannerism is Cultural Intelligence” is not a theory but a necessity for the globalized leader. “Manners make the Man” is not a moral judgment but a practical reality—we are what we repeatedly do.
To the leaders of tomorrow: Access is your platform, not your pedestal. Dignity is your armor. Appreciation is your fuel. The character you forge through your daily interactions is the master key that unlocks every door. Lead with the grace that acknowledges the humanity in every handshake, every email, and every glance. In doing so, you will not only harvest the “manna” of success but will cultivate a legacy of honor that outlives your tenure.
This is the concrete solution prescription: To lead is to serve with honor; to serve with honor is to practice impeccable manners; to practice impeccable manners is to secure the key to every door.
We all should further note that: The world does not need more leaders with sharper strategies; it needs leaders with softer hearts and stiffer backbones—leaders who understand that every interaction is an inheritance, and every word is a testament. This write-up, is a written manual, which I have placed in our hands to further turn it into remarkable actions across board, even in generations to come.
Dr. Tolulope A. Adegoke, AMBP-UN is a globally recognized scholar-practitioner and thought leader at the nexus of security, governance, and strategic leadership. His mission is dedicated to advancing ethical governance, strategic human capital development, resilient nation building, and global peace. He can be reached via: tolulopeadegoke01@gmail.com, globalstageimpacts@gmail.com
